Another question is that an ordinary user does not need all this abundance of functions, but even without referring to the configuration, this plugin does an excellent job with its main task. Unlike all extensions to block ads in the Google Chrome browser As we reviewed earlier, uBlock Origin has some impressive functionality that allows you to adjust the work of the extension yourself. This is necessary in cases where the resource refuses to display content with an active ad blocker. In the window that opens, the tabs are provided "My rules" y «My filters» , aimed at experienced users who want to adjust the work of the extension to suit their needs.Ĭommon users will find the tab useful "White list" , where you can add web resources for which the extension will be disabled to the list. To open them, click on the thumbnail gear icon in the upper left corner of uBlock Origin. This suggests that secondary methods may be available.In the lower area of the program menu, there are four buttons that are responsible for activating individual elements of the extension: enable or disable pop-ups, block large multimedia elements, the operation of cosmetic filters, and third-party management. However, discussions are ongoing and the draft document for manifest version 3 states that declarativeNetRequest would act as the primary content-blocking API in extensions. ![]() Some of them say that they would switch to a different browser should the proposal make it as it is into the final version of the manifest. Hill's comments remained unaddressed by the developers, but they got the vote of Chrome users chiming in. The rule set is used by AdBlock Plus and uBlock Origin and it is much larger than the limit imposed by the 'declarativeNetRequest'. Hill gives the example of the EasyList filters with rules for removing unwanted web content, which is larger than 30,000 entries and is not sufficient for a modern user's filtering needs. The proposed modification would promote static filtering capabilities that are compatible with AdBlock Plus and would limit the number of filters to 30,000. Hill explains that his extensions are incompatible with the proposed declarativeNetRequest API because it allows only one specific filtering engine, whereas uBlock Origin and uMatrix rely on various filtering designs to do their job properly. Another is that it offers better privacy guarantees because it allows extensions to tell Chrome what to do with a given request rather than have the browser forward the request to the extension this way, the extension does not have access to the network details. One argument in favor of the declarativeNetRequest as the primary content-blocking API in extensions is that it performs better. "If this (quite limited) declarativeNetRequest API ends up being the only way content blockers can accomplish their duty, this essentially means that two content blockers I have maintained for years, uBlock Origin ("uBO") and uMatrix, can no longer exist," he says on the bug tracking page for Manifest v3. Block pop-ups and annoying ads on websites like Facebook and YouTube. UMatrix, his other extension that enables the user to define which class of requests made by the web browser should be blocked, would share the same fate. Adblock Plus, the most popular ad blocker on Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Android and iOS. This modification would not cover all use cases and the webRequest functionality may end up being preserved in some form, the document states.ĭeveloper Raymond Hill says that phasing out 'webRequest' API in favor of the 'declarativeNetRequest' API would mean the death of uBlock Origin, his highly popular extension for filtering web content, used by over 10 million users. Content blockers should instead use declarativeNetRequest," reads the provisional document. ![]() ![]() "In Manifest V3, we will strive to limit the blocking version of webRequest, potentially removing blocking options from most events (making them observational only). In the next revision, Google plans to limit the blocking capabilities of the webRequest API, which these extensions utilize. The Google Chrome development team is working on making some changes to the Chrome Extensions platform that would end the functionality of ad-blockers like uBlock Origin and uMatrix, if implemented as defined in the current draft document.Įxtension capabilities are restricted through a mechanism called extension manifest, currently at version 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |